British Computer Society Distinguished Dissertations competition
Submissions are now open for the BCS Distinguished Dissertations competition for recently-submitted PhDs in the UK. The 2011 / 2012 CPHC/BCS Distinguished Dissertations competition is now open for submissions via the web site http://www.easychair.org/conferences/?conf=disdis12 Closing date Monday 2nd April 2012. Further details can be found below and on the webpage http://www.bcs.org/server.php?show=nav.5820 The Conference of Professors and Heads of Computing (CPHC), in conjunction with BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT, annually selects for publication the best British PhD/DPhil dissertations in computer science. The scheme aims to make more visible the significant contribution made by Britain -- in particular by post-graduate students -- to computer science. Publication also serves to provide a model for future students. The selection panel on behalf of BCS/CPHC consists of experienced computer scientists, not more than one from any institution, each normally serving on the panel for three years. The 2012 panel members are: Simon Thompson (Kent, Chair), Teresa Attwood (Manchester), Russell Beale (Birmingham), Simon Dobson (St Andrews), Zoubin Ghahramani (Cambridge), Joemon Jose (Glasgow), Daniel Kroening (Oxford), Ralph Martin (Cardiff), Alexander Romanovsky (Newcastle) and Jon Whittle (Lancaster). Any dissertation is eligible which is submitted for a doctorate in the British Isles in what is commonly understood as Computer Science. (Theses which are basically in some other discipline but which make use, even very extensive use, of computing will not be regarded as eligible.) However, there is a limit of THREE dissertations per year per university, and one per research group within any university. To be considered, a dissertation should:
- make a noteworthy contribution to the subject;
- reach a high standard of exposition;
- place its results clearly in the context of computer science as a whole; and
- enable a computer scientist with significantly different interests to grasp its essentials.
- a justification, of about 300 words, by one of the examiners -- preferably the external -- explaining the dissertation's claim to distinction (against the criteria listed above);
- the name of the primary supervisor and the research group within the university to which the student was primarily affiliated;
- an assurance that within the competition period the examiners have recommended to the author's institution that the doctorate should be awarded; and
- the names and contact details of three suggested reviewers who are not in the same Department as the nominated thesis and who are independent of the supervision and examining of the thesis. The nominated reviewers must have confirmed that they are willing to provide a review.
CommentsComments powered by Disqus